The Community of Lightweight Hiking and Backcountry Travel

Forum Index » The G Spot » LuxuryLite or ULA Catalyst


Display Avatars Sort By:
Paulo Pereira
(ppereira007)
Re: Re: Luxury Lite or ULA Catalyst on 03/13/2006 16:41:46 MST Print View

Verndal-
Did you get the front pack with it?

Verndal Lee
(JAGC)

Locale: Pacific NW
Re: Re: Re: Luxury Lite or ULA Catalyst on 03/13/2006 17:36:03 MST Print View

Paulo -

Yes, got the front pack AND the umbrella also. Hope to try everything out this weekend. I was planning on going on an overnight trip this past weekend, then woke up to snow on the ground Saturday.

Carol Corbridge
(ccorbridge) - M

Locale: Southern Oregon
Re: Re: Re: Re: Luxury Lite or ULA Catalyst on 03/20/2006 09:10:25 MST Print View

Verndal,

Have you tried it out yet? Any further thoughts?

Verndal Lee
(JAGC)

Locale: Pacific NW
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Luxury Lite or ULA Catalyst on 03/20/2006 09:39:36 MST Print View

Carol,

I went for a very short 2.5 mile hike with the LL pack, loaded with my base weight of 17 pounds, to get a feel for the pack. This is what Bruce Warren recommends. The pack felt GREAT - the weight was all on my hips, none on my shoulders. Unlike other packs, Bruce suggests placing the heavy stuff in the bottom cylinder - so that's where the tent, raingear, and stove went. I put my down bag and spare clothes in the top cylinder, and used the middle cylinder for food and misc.

There is a review of the LL pack posted by Henry Martinat on March 18th. He did the AT trail in 2005 using one. Like him, I have 2 large and 1 medium cylinders.

Next hike, I plan to use the front pack. It's dorky looking, but is supposed to add some counterbalance weight to the LL pack - not that much is needed.

Hope this helps you.