MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review

With new fabrics, a strong design and plenty of pitching options, the HP is quite attractive. Will this relatively lightweight double-wall abode have us exclaiming with enthusiasm or will we hurry on to the next cutie?

Recommended

Overall Rating: Recommended

While not the lightest tent available, the MSR Hubba Hubba HP may be the most well rounded, with a lot of pitching options to cut weight further if desired. Its four-season performance was the best this reviewer has ever seen in a light weight three-season tent. Some very thoughtful design elements add to the enjoyment of this strong, roomy tent.

About This Rating

M Find other top product reviews »

Print Jump to Reader Comments

by Ray Estrella |

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review

hub⋅ba hub⋅ba [huhb-uh huhb-uh]: noun, slang
  1. An exclamation of admiration, approval, or enthusiasm, used esp. by GIs of World War II as a shout in appreciation of a pretty girl. (Ex: Hubba-hubba, she’s a purdy one.)
  2. Hurry up. (Ex. Hubba-hubba, drop and give me 20 now soldier.)
Hubba Hubba HP: noun, name
  1. MSR’s lightweight version of their very popular Hubba Hubba 2P tent.

Introduction

The Hubba Hubba HP is Mountain Safety Research’s (MSR) lightest two-person free-standing tent. By the use of new strong yet lightweight materials, they have come up with a double-wall tent that has a trail weight of 3.85 pounds (1.75 kg), a savings of 8 ounces (227 g) over the standard Hubba Hubba 2P tent that it is based on. Even lighter options can be had by pitching in one of the freestanding tarp-shelter modes, with optional footprint or just the fly and poles alone. While not the lightest tent in its category, it may be the most capable. During the course of the testing, it was used in full-on winter conditions where it shone (even though the sun did not).

Specifications

Year/Manufacturer/Model 2009 Mountain Safety Research Hubba Hubba HP 2 Person Tent
Style Three-season, two-person, double-wall tent.
Fabrics Body: 20D x 330T ripstop nylon 66 & DWR & 20D polyester mesh
Floor: 40D x 238T ripstop nylon 6 10000mm polyurethane & DWR coated
Fly: 20D x 330T ripstop nylon 66 1000mm polyurethane & silicone coated
Poles and Stakes Poles: DAC Featherlite NSL pole system with press fit connectors and lightweight hubs, total weight 16.5 oz (468 g)
Stakes: 8 needle stakes, 6.25 in (16 cm), 0.35 oz (10 g) each, 2.8 oz (79 g) total
Dimensions Length Listed: 84 in (213 cm)
Width Listed: 50 In (127 cm)
Inside Height Listed: 40 in (102 cm)
BPL Verified Accurate
Packed Size 6.5 x 19 in (16 x 48 cm)
Total Weight Listed Weight: 4.25 lb (1.93 kg)
BPL Measured Weight: 4.27 lb (1.94 kg)
BPL Trail Weight 3.85 lb (1.75 kg)
Protected Area Floor Area: 29 ft2 (2.7 m2)
Vestibule Area: 17.5 ft2 (1.6 m2)
Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 12.08 ft2/lb (2.46 m2/kg)
MSRP US $449.95
Options Footprint 5.9 oz (167 g)
Website www.cascadedesigns.com

Design and Features

The Hubba Hubba HP is based on MSR's very popular Hubba Hubba. From what I can tell, it uses the same poles as the standard version. I am not sure what the HP stands for, but it's most likely High Performance. Or maybe Heavy-duty Protection (or Habitat Perfection?). By switching to lighter fabrics they cut quite a bit of weight from the regular version, but it is the additions that shine more than the subtracted weight.

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 1
Top: The breathable white nylon of the Hubba Hubba HP’s inner reflects sun quite well when set up sans fly. The few areas of mesh are placed in locations that optimize ventilation. A mesh gear loft (seen as a darker layer) mirrors the diamond shape top mesh opening to allow it to be used to dry wet gear. Notice how steep the sides and ends are, which translates into lots of room. Bottom: Two standard size pads fit with ease in the HP, two large or deluxe sized pads will fit too, but only just. The symmetrical fly shape sheds wind quite well.

The DAC pole and hub system is comprised of twenty-two pole sections all joined together, which when assembled form a double-ended Y (or a headless stick man drawing) with a crossing pole at the center. For those that carry their poles separately, as I do, they make a package roughly 3 inches (7.5 cm) in diameter and 17 inches (43 cm) long. The ends of the poles plug into grommets at the four corners of the floor, and the crossing pole plugs into grommets at the top of each door. Then the body connects to the poles by means of eight nylon clips.

The body is mostly comprised of white, breathable nylon 66 that has a DWR application to fight both condensation that may drip from the fly or water blown past it. According to MSR, this fabric weighs 55 grams per square meter (which is the exact weight of the mesh used for the walls of the regular Hubba Hubba). Ventilation is enhanced by triangular areas of mesh at the upper portion of the two D-shaped doors and the ends of the tent. Another large diamond-shaped section of mesh is at the very top. A 0.7 oz (20 g) removable mesh gear loft hangs directly below this diamond. The gear loft does not inhibit air movement when empty and can assist in drying wet gear when used. More in-house storage is provided by long gear pockets that run along the ends of the HP just above the bath-tub floor.

Interestingly, the fly is made of the same fabric as the inner body, with the additions of 1000mm polyurethane and silicone coatings. The fly goes over the poles connecting at the corners and crossing pole ends with grommets also. A stake at the bottom of each vestibule pulls it away from the tent inner to create a protected space in front of each door. A nice touch is the fact that the vestibule may be staked out from either side, allowing you to open whichever side is the most protected from blowing wind, rain, and snow. Another nice touch is the protected zipper “garages” at the top of the two-way waterproof zippers that keep any water from finding its way in. The vestibules can be used for ventilation by either opening the top or bottom, plus there are two hooded vents at the ends of the HP that correspond to the mesh areas mentioned earlier. These vents use a strut to hold them open and can be adjusted from inside the vestibule.

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 2
Top Left: Hooded vents at each end provide excellent air movement as they correspond to… Top Right: the triangular mesh areas found at each end of the inner tent. Large gear pockets are seen below. The white fabric really keeps the inside of the tent bright and cheery. Bottom Left: The waterproof zippers on the vestibules have a hooded parking spot to keep water drops at bay. Bottom Right: Vestibule pull-out points can be staked from either side of the door. Lightweight tensioners allow for adjustment in the pitch.

The HP comes with eight red anodized aluminum needle stakes, in order to fully stake out the tent with two extra for use at guy points or to pull out the ends for greater ventilation. The square-bodied stakes come inside of a 0.3-ounce (9 g) stake sack. Sharing the sack are two lengths of guy line, two line tensioners, and a pole repair sleeve. A 0.6-ounce (17 g) pole sack is provided too, and the whole works fits in the 1.7-ounce (48 g) gold stuff sack. There is plenty of extra room in the sack to carry a footprint, although I do not have one. By carrying the poles separately, I can compress the stuffed tent to about 60% of the size seen below. I joked with my brother-in-law Dave that Henry Shires would have put the HP into a stuff sack 50% smaller (Tarptent joke, others move along…).

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 3
Top Left: Sing along now. A stuff sack for the tent and another for the poles. Some guy lines, and two tensioners, and stakes that make square holes. A little stake sack and tube for pole repair, the fly and the body makes up what all is there. (Groan…) Top Right: Although the HP does not look that small packed, there's a lot of extra room in the stuff sack.

Speaking of tarps, MSR calls the lighter ways to pitch the HP its “freestanding tarp-shelter modes.” The HP can be set up using the poles and fly with the optional footprint in what I think of as a fast-fly set-up, weighing 2.75 pounds (1.25 kg). Or it can be done sans footprint with just the poles and fly for its lightest option, truly a tarp experience that comes in at 2.38 pounds (1.08 kg). I didn't try the latter option, as I did not receive the footprint, and the weather I used the HP in did not facilitate sleeping on the ground/snow/mud. Regardless, they certainly are nice options to have.

Performance

I owned and used a MSR Mutha Hubba 3P tent for two years with my children Emma and Raymond. As the pole design and set-up of the Hubba Hubba HP is very similar to the many Big Agnes tents I have owned over the years, I found the set-up to be intuitive and quick. Having only eight clips to attach the body makes set-up quicker than the up to thirteen clips on some of the other tents of this size and style. That counts when I am rushing to get it up before the sun goes down like one winter afternoon in the snow covered San Bernardino Mountains, or to get it up during a break in the rain that we found ourselves dealing with on the Pacific Crest Trail near the Mexican border.

Because of the time of year that I started testing the Hubba Hubba HP, it saw a lot of bad weather. I had another tent that I was testing at the same time that is absolutely NOT a winter tent, so I left the HP behind whenever it seemed like the weather would be decent. I knew that I had stacked the deck against the HP and expected to be making excuses for it. Instead, I was completely taken by surprise at how well it did (and for what it’s worth, the poor other tent has only seen one nice day so far. Stay tuned…).

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 4
Top: On the truly frozen tundra of northern Minnesota. The MSR needle stakes actually penetrated enough to be usable, which was good as there was not enough snow to use snow stakes. Bottom: My winter bags are my longest bags, but this -20 F (-29 C) model, on an Exped DownMat 9, fits with room to spare.

In late November, I used the HP in high winds at Buffalo River State Park in Minnesota (MN). It shrugged the weather off and of course had no condensation at all. One month later I was back at the same park, pictured above. It had been well below 0 F (-18 C) the week before I was there, and while it had warmed up to 9 F (-13 C), the ground was frozen hard. Two days earlier I was at the same location with a different tent that had big round aluminum stakes that bent trying to hammer them in, so I was delighted to see the MSR needle stakes actually go into the frozen ground well enough to hold it in place and with not a single one bent. As the wind just about always blows in MN, I again had no condensation to speak of, just a little frost around the hood opening of my bag.

The last day of January, I did not bring the needle stakes as the nearest ground, frozen or otherwise was seven feet (2 m) under the snow in the mountains of California. I did bring Jenn (ex-wife and still friend) to see how it would do with an extra body heating the space up and adding moisture inside. We were at 9,000 feet (2750 m) elevation with temperatures that got down to 17 F (-8 C). We had a little bit of wind early in the evening, which I wanted to take advantage of. Jenn boycotted that, saying it was too cold with the door open, so I buttoned the HP up but did have both end vents propped open. The wind stopped shortly after it got dark. I was amazed to find in the morning that not one bit of condensation had formed on the inner tent and there was no frost inside the fly. We both had very limited condensation around our faces, hers on the hood of her bag and me on my fleece balaclava and the edge of my Arc Expedition quilt.

The tent provided adequate room for both of us, although the packs had to stay in the vestibules. Fortunately the vestibules are big enough to stow the pack and still be able to go in and out of the tent with ease. When the snow is deep enough, I dig an entry pit in the vestibules that aids in getting in and out. It makes a great seat with a view too. Of course from where Jenn sat she just had a view of a great seat…

One last trip with it to Buffalo River State Park saw about a foot (30 cm) of snow. Once I stomped out a tent space, I was able to hammer the stakes into the frozen ground again. They only went in a little ways but held well. The next morning, though, they were so frozen in that I had a heck of a time getting them out. I did have some frost inside the fly in the morning, as for once there was no wind and the humidity was high.

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 5
Top: Early morning in the mountains of California. The Hubba Hubba HP worked wonderfully for two on this snowy trip. The vestibules, dug out for sitting, held our packs while still allowing access. Bottom: Jenn’s -5 F bag (with her head peeking out) and my 0 F quilt puffed up to take most of the room, but we were comfortable. The white fabric reflects a lot light, making it seem bright even in dreary conditions.

Assessment

I came away from this test really liking the Hubba Hubba HP. While I have lighter tents, I don’t have any that are both lighter and as versatile in a range of conditions. In fact, over the past couple of months I have come to the decision that if I could have only one tent period, for all use, I would choose the HP. It has proven to be excellent at winter weather. I have used it right through the dead of winter in both Minnesota and California, and it has done as well as my four-season tents that weigh more. Now I did not experience any blizzard conditions, and I am not saying that this is a four-season tent (nor does MSR), but it easily pushes the boundaries for a three-season tent and does so well.

The solid fabric is a big contributor to how well the tent worked for me. It breathes extremely well, yet blocks all the blowing snow and dust that mesh lets through. The tent was also warmer, as the fabric kept the wind from blowing away residual heat trapped inside, and the color certainly made the inside bright. Jenn’s little Orbit lantern lit the tent up nicely as it reflected off the walls.

The ventilation has been the best I have seen so far this year. Condensation is almost non-existent in this tent, even with two in it. I am a very light sleeper and wake up each time I turn (about twice an hour). Each time I wake, I run my hand on the tent walls around my head to see what is happening condensation-wise. I never got a wet hand with the HP.

It is also quite roomy. Even with two of us, we had plenty of space to hang out on the long cold winter nights in the mountains. The crossing pole makes for plenty of headroom in the middle section of the tent all the way across, not just in the dead center.

From my limited use, largely on snow, it seems to be durable, but further use will see what wear and tear it gets. I like the Hubba Hubba HP so much that I just ordered a footprint for it and will try it in some other pitching modes later this year (testing schedule allowing). I would also like to try it with just the inner pitched, which is my favorite fair weather way to use a double-wall (the fly sits in the stuff sack, just in case). I may send in an addendum to this story later, sharing any new thoughts and findings I have.

After thinking about my personal feeling of the Hubba Hubba HP, I am guessing the HP stands for 'Happy Packer.'

Dare to Compare

How does the Hubba Hubba HP stack up to the competition? Other tents that share common features like dual doors/vestibules and free-standing style, and limited winter worthiness are the Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2, Tarptent Scarp 2 (with crossing poles) and the REI Quarter Dome T2.

The Scarp 2 has the most inside space, but with the optional crossing poles, it weighs the most too. It is the only one that sets up while keeping the inside dry as the inner stays attached to the fly. The Copper Spur UL2 has the lowest weight and the most protected space-to-weight with its large vestibules. It does well in shoulder season weather too (I have one), but not as well as the HP. The Quarter Dome T2 is a stand-out at the price. The HP is the most expensive of the bunch. Maybe HP stands for 'High Priced'...

Manufacturer and Model MSR Hubba Hubba HP Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2 REI Quarter Dome T2 Tarptent Scarp 2
Manufacturer Trail Weight1 lb (kg) 3.69 (1.67) 3.37 (1.53) 3.75 (1.7) 4.44 (2.01) (with mesh interior and optional poles)
Backpacking Light Trail Weight3 lb (kg) 3.9 (1.77) 3.37 (1.53) 3.8 (1.72) 3.84 (1.74) (with mesh interior and optional poles)
Fabrics Floor: 40D nylon 66, 10,000mm PU
Fly: 20D 1000mm PU/silicone coated nylon
Body: 20D nylon 66 & 20D polyester mesh
Floor/Fly: 1200mm PU/silicone coated ripstop nylon
Body: nylon & polyester mesh
Floor: coated ripstop nylon
Fly: coated ripstop nylon
Body: nylon mesh
Floor/Fly: 1.3oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon
Inner: 0.7 oz/yd2 (23.7 g/m2) nylon mesh
Poles DAC Featherlite NSL pole system w/ two hubs & short crossing pole DAC Featherlite NSL pole system with two hubs and crossing pole DAC Featherlite NSL pole system with two hubs One Easton aluminum center hoop pole, ten carbon fiber struts in sleeves at ends
Dimensions4 LxWxH in (cm) 84x50x42 (213x127x107) 90x52/42x42 (229x132/107x107) 84x48x40 (213x122x101) 86x52x45 (218x132x114)
Floor Area ft2(m2) 29 (2.7) 29.0 (2.69) 28 (2.6) 31 (2.99)
Number of Vestibules & Area ft2(m2) 2 - 17.5 (1.6) 2 - 18.0 (1.67) 2 - 13.4 (1.24) 2 - 12 (1.11)
Floor Area/Trail Weight Ratio5 ft2/lb (m2/kg) 7.44 (1.53) 8.6 (1.76) 7.37 (1.51) 9.5 (2.02)
Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio6 ft2/lb (m2/kg) 11.9 (2.43) 13.9 (2.84) 10.9 (2.23) 13.2 (2.77)
Cost US$ 450 400 269 355 (with optional poles)

Notes:

1Manufacturer Trail Weight: The minimum weight as listed by the manufacturer. Different companies may include different components in this weight.

3Backpacking Light Trail Weight: The weight of tent, rain fly, poles, and stakes needed for basic set-up. It does not include stuffsacks, extra guylines, extra stakes, or repair kit.

4Dimensions: maximum Length x maximum Width x maximum Height (LxWxH) In the case of odd-shaped floor, a double measurement is given for head and foot (H/F). The numbers are as verified by BPL and may differ from the manufacturers' stated dimensions.

5Floor Area/Trail Weight Ratio: The floor area divided by the trail weight.

6Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio: The floor area plus vestibule area divided by the trail weight.

What's Good

  • Winter-worthy performance
  • Plenty of room for two people
  • Excellent ventilation
  • Lots of interior space
  • Very strong stakes

What's Not So Good

  • Price at the high end of the scale
  • One of the heaviest tents in the lightweight two-person double-wall class

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review - 6
The HP has plenty of room to sit up inside like here on my last trip with it in February 2010. This is a lot of snow for northern Minnesota, the HP said “bring it on.”

Disclosure: The manufacturer provided this product to the author and/or Backpacking Light at no charge, and it is owned by the author/BPL. The author/Backpacking Light has no obligation to review this product to the manufacturer under the terms of this agreement.


Citation

"MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review," by Ray Estrella. BackpackingLight.com (ISSN 1537-0364).
http://backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/msr_hubba_hubba_hp_tent_review.html, 2010-04-13 00:05:00-06.

Print

Reader Comments

You must login to post comments.

New Visitors: Create a new account
Username:
Password:
Remember my login info.

Forum Index » Editor's Roundtable » MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review


Display Avatars
Sort By:
Addie Bedford
(addiebedford) - MLife

Locale: Montana
MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review on 04/13/2010 15:24:33 MDT Print View

Companion forum thread to:

MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review

Chris W
(simplespirit) - MLife

Locale: WNC
Re: MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review on 04/13/2010 17:05:26 MDT Print View

Where did the Scarp 2 weights come from? Seems like they're about a pound too heavy.

Daniel Goldenberg
(dag4643)

Locale: Pacific Northwet
Re: Re: MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review on 04/13/2010 17:23:00 MDT Print View

Scarp weight appears to include the crossing poles.

Chris W
(simplespirit) - MLife

Locale: WNC
Re: Scarp Weight on 04/13/2010 17:24:25 MDT Print View

Interesting. Those aren't part of the standard package/configuration and the price doesn't indicate their inclusion. One of the two should be updated and a note added that they're optional but included in the comparison.

Daniel Goldenberg
(dag4643)

Locale: Pacific Northwet
Re: Re: Scarp Weight on 04/13/2010 17:28:10 MDT Print View

I agree, the footnoted descriptions of the listed weights (for example trail weight) would seem to indicate that the weight of the poles should not be included, since they are not required for the basic setup.

Only reason to include weight with poles would be to compare all the tents in "freestanding" mode.

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
Scarp weight on 04/13/2010 20:46:58 MDT Print View

Hi guys, just found out this went up.

No I have it completely wrong. And I have no idea where it came from.

It should have been this:

Listed trail wt: 3.37 (1.53)Only total weight listed
BPL trail wt: 3.26 (1.48)

That is what I have on my huge comparative table for all the tents in the upcoming SOTMR. I really don't know how the other numbers got there.

I have had a lot of Tarptents and have never seen one over the listed weight. All have been within an oz under, never over. My Hogback is 0.3 oz under listed.

I am sorry for the mistake, it was certainly not intentional. Thank you for bringing it to my/our attention.

Now I need to go back over hours of accumulated data...

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
more clarification on 04/13/2010 20:57:49 MDT Print View

OK, this was bugging me and I have been going over it.

The upcoming SOTMR looks at the Scarp in 3-season mode. In this comparison I included the crossing poles and said so in the paragraph above the table. I did this as I have had the CS and Hubba HP in winter conditions which the Scarp does as long as it has the poles.

So the numbers were right with the optional poles.

But thanks for keeping me on my toes.

Amy Lauterbach
(drongobird) - MLife

Locale: San Francisco Bay Area
MSR Hubba Hubba color on 04/13/2010 23:03:26 MDT Print View

Thanks for a great review.
It only matters to a subset of users, but the color of the fly is not compatible with stealth camping, another thing for the "not so good" list.

Edited by drongobird on 04/13/2010 23:04:12 MDT.

Dave U
(FamilyGuy) - F

Locale: Rockies
Hubba Hp on 04/13/2010 23:11:37 MDT Print View

Sadly, MSR sells the Hubba HP series with a green fly and dark green floor in Europe.

Rog Tallbloke
(tallbloke) - F

Locale: DON'T LOOK DOWN!!
Re: Hubba Hp on 04/14/2010 00:10:59 MDT Print View

If anyone wants a green one, I'll do the shipping thing.

Mark McLauchlin
(markmclauchlin) - MLife

Locale: Western Australia
Re: Re: Hubba Hp on 04/14/2010 00:45:53 MDT Print View

Nice review Ray, more keen than ever to get one for hiking with the kids.

Keep it up.

Cheers

Dave U
(FamilyGuy) - F

Locale: Rockies
MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review on 04/14/2010 08:24:47 MDT Print View

Hey Rog, I am going to keep that in mind!

Edited by FamilyGuy on 04/14/2010 08:28:46 MDT.

P. P.
(toesnorth) - F

Locale: PNW
MSR Hubba Hubba HP Tent Review on 04/14/2010 10:19:09 MDT Print View

Nice review, as usual, Ray. Thanks.

christopher culvern
(culcn) - F
big agnes floor area on 04/14/2010 10:48:47 MDT Print View

first off, great review. however, i was curious how you got the floor area for the big agnes. i know there are two dimensions but is this the usable floor area, or min, or max, or actual calculated area?

Edited by culcn on 04/14/2010 10:54:36 MDT.

Dan Durston
(dandydan) - M

Locale: Cascadia
Big Agnes on 04/14/2010 12:16:31 MDT Print View

For the Big Agnes floor area, when I multiply the floor length (90") by the average width (52+42/2 = 47) I get 4230 square inches which corresponds to 29.375 square feet since there are 144 square inches in a square foot.

From the looks of the article, Ray is probably doing the same math and just rounding to the nearest square foot, since all the tents floor area is only listed to the square foot.

Edited by dandydan on 04/14/2010 12:18:48 MDT.

nanook ofthenorth
(nanookofthenorth) - MLife
... on 04/14/2010 13:53:46 MDT Print View

great review but how is it in hot and hot/humid weather?

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
Re: on 04/14/2010 15:13:19 MDT Print View

Thank you guys (and gals),

It is calculated area, and yes I just round off to the closest sq ft. I go by their numbers to start with, checking it once I get a sample. If their numbers are wrong it gets changed and recalc’ed, which then changes all the weight/area ratios. It can be a pain. Thank goodness we don’t track volume…

I only had the tent in late fall and winter so no data for hot, humid areas, Robert. We are limited to the time we have to use an item unless we drag out the review. As we are looking at a very large amount of tents in a relatively short time (8 months) we have to work with the window we have.

That said I would “guess” that it would do well. If it were not raining I would set it up in those conditions sans fly. If raining I have to say that the ventilation scheme is as good as I have seen, but I really don’t know how it will work for you.

P. P.
(toesnorth) - F

Locale: PNW
MSR Hubba Hubba HP on 04/14/2010 15:45:24 MDT Print View

Ray,
Do you think that the Hubba Hubba HP would be significantly better in shoulder seasons than the Copper Spur UL2?

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
better than CS on 04/14/2010 17:15:49 MDT Print View

I have a lot of experience with the CS in winter conditions and yes, I really do think the HP is better. I was so impressed with it that I sold one of my 4-season tents and rotated this into its place. My plan is to use this for all but dead-of-winter or harsh locales (extreme winds, monster snow fall, etc).

Mike Lamper
(Lamper) - F
Re: Hubba Hp on 04/15/2010 04:05:08 MDT Print View

That is very odd.

I ordered mine from www.cheaptents.com last April - he sent me the one he was going to use for display as I bugged him about wanting it so much.

Mine is Yellow and very bright! Looks awesome in my photos with a lantern inside.

Also, last summer I used the HP in the tarp mode with footprint and its very comfortable. The extra room you gain in the vestibules with no inner is great and gives easy access to bag and even cook inside.

For night when humidity is high I also use a TI Goat Ptarmigan bivy as a sleeping bag cover against the damp.

Works a treat!

Edited by Lamper on 04/15/2010 04:09:02 MDT.

Richard Sullivan
(richard.s) - MLife

Locale: Supernatural BC
Marriage Temperature Ratings on 04/15/2010 18:34:40 MDT Print View

My wife is threatening divorce below 65F but your ex is good down to 17F? :))

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
wives and ex's on 04/15/2010 20:01:29 MDT Print View

Ha!

Now that we're not married she "needs" me to take her hiking. (She is more into biking and doesn't have BPer friends.) It works well as I get another body to test how the tent works for two and handles condensation. Win win...

She is going to help me test the SD Strike in 9 days. Thanks Jenn. ;-)

Bob Bankhead
(wandering_bob) - MLife

Locale: Oregon, USA
Wives vs. Exs on 04/15/2010 21:20:33 MDT Print View

NEVER mix the two. To do so brings a whole new definition to the terms "spontaneous combustion" and "critical mass".

If my wife were to ever agree to my running off to the hills to share a tent (or anything else) with my ex-wife, I'd take that as prima facea evidence that my 2nd divorce was just around the corner.

You might want to rethink this one!

Edited by wandering_bob on 04/15/2010 21:22:12 MDT.

Mike Lamper
(Lamper) - F
Re: Wives vs. Exs on 04/16/2010 02:43:42 MDT Print View

Did someone say "Ménage à trois" :)

Benjamin Brand
(stern-sirius) - F
First choice on 04/17/2010 14:37:26 MDT Print View

First of all thank's for the review!

It's interesting to compare the "Hubba Hubba HP" to the "Tarptent Scarp 2" and the "Big Sky Evolution 2P".

Which one would you choose first for mountain trips?

Edited by stern-sirius on 04/17/2010 14:38:30 MDT.

Raymond Estrella
(rayestrella) - MLife

Locale: Northern Minnesota
re on 04/21/2010 11:53:15 MDT Print View

Ha, you guys are getting me mixed up here. I am NOT married right now. Jenn IS the ex wife. I would never think of trying that mixture.

I have never used a BSI Evolution. I have used the Revolution one night. (Nice tent) I liked how fast the Scarp 2 sets up, but found the crossing poles to be a pain if they are needed. But I would take the HP of those.

If I were expecting extreme weather I would still take my Bibler Fitzroy or BA String Ridge though.

Bryan Hickerson
(BHick) - F
hubba hubba hp on 04/28/2010 12:52:49 MDT Print View

Raymond, I'm interested in this tent as being my main "go to" tent. I'm 6'2" and curious if the listed floor dimensions are "real". Is the floor really 84" and are the end walls nearly vertical? I've gotten in a few tents where the floor length listed is quite shy of what I measure. I'm basically looking for a reliable double wall 3 season 2 person that can accomodate my height without my head and feet touching the ends. I'd like to keep the total weight below 5 lbs. The CS UL2 fits this but I'm not fired up about how the doors unzip (top and sides), so that the door either falls on the tent floor or on the ground.

I've enjoyed this site. Thanks for the info here!

Bryan

Edited by BHick on 04/28/2010 12:57:03 MDT.

Bryan Hickerson
(BDHick) - F
thanks for the reviews on 04/29/2010 06:22:48 MDT Print View

I just purchased a membership so I can read the many reviews here. Your review answered some questions. BTW - I grew up in Bemidji! I love northern MN!