|
Brian--Thanks for your reply. I guess the problem comes when one feels one only has room in ones life for one more pack, not two, and has to choose. If the loss of trail functionality was limited to the absence of side pockets, or more generally, packing flexibility, for me that would be an acceptable trade-off to gain the Arctic's advantages. But if the Catalyst, for example, "carried" much better than the Arctic, i.e., fit and moved much better, then it would be a harder choice. And it's hard to know without having both packs to try in front of one, so any specific guidance would be much appreciated.
|