Not only did I watch it but more importantly I listened carefully to what was being said. Mr. Romney certainly did look confident and well composed which, if that's how you're judging, then yea he won. If you're judging by content, consistency and understand of economics then Obama won by a long shot.
Mr. Romney stated he would not cut taxes for the top 1% earners, yet he has previously stated, many times, that he will cut taxes 20% across the board, including the top 1%. So which one is it? The tax policy center has analyzed his plan and stated that his will cost the average family more money, not less like he stated last night. He didn't mention any of the loopholes he would close either.
He said he's for the "pursuit of happiness for all" yet he firmly stand against g** marriage. Yea, that makes sense.
So why would I vote for someone who I don't know where they stand? I'm not willing to roll the dice like that. It just seems like he will say anything, regardless of truth, to get your vote. That's no way to "win" a debate.
From one clueless guy to another, RS, I won't vote if you don't. ;)
No one even seem to notice Gary wasn't in the debate.