November 20, 2015 8:16 PM MST - Subscription purchasing, account maintenance, forum profile maintenance, new account registration, and forum posting have been disabled
as we prepare our databases for the final migration to our new server next week. Stay tuned here for more details.
Subscribe Contribute Advertise Facebook Twitter Instagram Forums Newsletter
Gatewood v. Hexamid v. Cricket
Display Avatars Sort By:
David Passey
(davidpassey) - F

Locale: New York City
Gatewood v. Hexamid v. Cricket on 03/24/2011 05:59:49 MDT Print View

I'm thinking about switching from my current solo set-up (a Spinntwin / BMW bivy) for one of the shelters listed in the subject line. My reason for switching is mostly for fun, but I have a few questions:

1. Which of these shelters can be used w/o a bivy to keep spindrift off? I currently use a WM highlite or a Arc AT, plus Montbell Alpine Light. I'm not thrilled about getting much moisture on either set-up. If I can get to 11 oz, I can knock a few oz off my current shelter shelter system.

2. Which of these shelters has the most interior room?

3. Which of these shelters is the most stable in the wind?

It's true that the cape could substitute for a rain jacket/pack cover, but I already use the silcoat cape, which is very light and serves both those purposes. I'm really looking at each just for the shelter aspects.

Thanks for the input.

Brian Lewis
(brianle) - F

Locale: Pacific NW
Gatewood Cape vs. Wild Oasis on 03/24/2011 10:24:59 MDT Print View

I have no knowledge or experience with the other two shelters, but if you really don't want the Gatewood Cape as raingear --- just shelter --- I would look instead at the essentially-the-same SMD Wild Oasis, which offers bug protection.

I won't lay out the pros and cons of the G.C. as there are existing threads that do that quite well ...

Dennis Park
(dpark) - MLife

Locale: San Francisco Bay Area
Re: Gatewood Cape vs. Wild Oasis on 04/14/2012 19:04:40 MDT Print View

I too am going through the same debate. Anybody with some opinions comparing the three?

Jon Leibowitz
(jleeb) - F - MLife

Locale: 4Corners
My experience on 04/14/2012 19:52:11 MDT Print View

I can only speak for the experience I have, which is nothing but a positive one with the Gatewood/Serenity combo. Without the Serenity, the interior is huge, with it, it is more limited but still more than enough to sit up and move around. It also does really well in the wind.

Even if you don't use it as your sole rainwear, I think it's still worth it because it's always nice to have a spare or double rain protection. And as a shelter alone, it's as lightweight and durable as any other.

John Abela
(JohnAbela) - MLife

Re: Gatewood v. Hexamid v. Cricket on 04/14/2012 22:17:21 MDT Print View

Hello David,

You might be interested in checking out my SUL/XUL Enclosed Shelter Comparison article and the spreadsheet associated with it.

To directly answer your questions:

1) All three will provide enough coverage. The Gatewood should provide the greatest amount of protection due to it having full sides rather than a short beak like the other two. That said, used properly the other two are fully capable of keeping your gear dry - you simply shift to the non-door side of the shelter when it is raining. The beak on the hexamid can pretty much solve the issue as well. You could also use a much stepper angle on the cricket beak/entrace to provide much greater rain protection. So, honestly, all three should perform their job properly. Oh, and lets not forget... there is a reason that hiking gear has DWR ;)

2) Trying to get us to do the leg work for you eh lol (gigle)? Visit their websites and the math yourself ;) (though it would be nice if these cottage companies actually listed their square footage of room). But in the end remember, it is not always about the math. All of these are going to be about the same - but what really matters (AFAIC) is the "usable square footage". To me, the Hexamid feels like it does not have a lot, but it usually seems to have enough for my gear. To me, the Gatewood feels like it does not have a lot, and every time I get in one, I continue to say that. To me, the Cricket seems to have that "bump my head when I sit up" feeling, but it does seem to have a nice bit of usable sq footage. Plus, it all really depends on how big you are (both height and fat). At 6' all of them can feel small when the weather is really bad and you are all holed up inside of them. But hey, guess what, that is what comes with a "solo" shelter! Hikers concerned about room inside of their shelter should by a 2 person shelter :-D

3) I have never had the Gatewood setup in strong wind... but I would put it in this order: hexamid, cricket, gatewood. Remember though, the hexamid can take up to 10 stakes, thereby adding additional weight for the additional guylines and stakes. Forsake not the terminology "Total Shelter Weight" - but at the same time, the Hexamid is the lightest enclosed shelter that is out there and worth buying I feel. You can have it fully setup at 354 grams (12.48 ounces / 0.78 pounds) and that is saying something!

Something to consider: you should included the "SMD Skyscape X" in your list. For an additional few ounces (ok, and a lot more money than the cricket/gatewood) you can have yourself a fully enclosed shelter. At 425 grams it is the definitive of a SUL solo shelter - and possibly the lightest fully enclosed on piece total shelter weight shelter in the world! I wrote an article on it that could be worth reading. A bit more money, a couple more ounces - but all three of your above questions would be nullified by going with it.

Hope some of this helps!
John B. Abela

Bob Bankhead
(wandering_bob) - MLife

Locale: Oregon, USA
Gatewood v. Hexamid v. Cricket on 04/15/2012 09:33:35 MDT Print View

Spindrift = fine rain, snow, or sand blown about by the wind

Any shelter that does not extend all the way to the ground can potentially admit spindrift. Mesh will slow but not totally stop it. The more covered floor area you have, the further away from the edge of the canopy you can sleep, and the less likely it is that eventual spindrift will reach you. Small tarp? Use a bivy or other barrier. No bivy? Use a larger tarp. Staking the perimeter of a tarp all the way to the ground reduces not only spindrift access but also ventilation, headroom, and useable floor space.

I've owned and used the Gatewood Cape for years. It is my go-to shelter (with and without the Serenity Net Tent) for the PCT and CT. I've seen and examined the Hexamids and Skyskapes; no experience with the Cricket.

Unlike its twin, the Wild Oasis, the GC lacks any netting around the perimeter so unless you stake it to the ground, spindrift will get in. The latest version of the SNT adds a bathtub floor and so gives some protection. I've had the GC withstand winds in excess of 35 mph all night - when properly staked. A cuben fiber Wild Oasis would be the bomb and weigh about 11 ounces.

The Hexamids will give good coverage, but I'd say get the largest model you can as the perimeter and floor are all mesh, which slows but does not stop spindrift. Staking the canopy to the ground (storm mode) will help but cost you living space.

The Skyskape series has full netting and a bathtub floor and may be the best of both worlds, especially the X in cuben fiber but the cost is $450.

Edited by wandering_bob on 04/15/2012 09:35:29 MDT.

tyler marlow

Locale: UTAH
Hexamid or Bearpaw Diamond on 04/15/2012 10:42:35 MDT Print View

I would vote for the Hexamid tent. I use the Hexamid Twin, but also have experience with my friend's Hex Solo tent and have to say I am a huge fan. Plenty of room and great coverage in a super light, all enclosed package.

Another option would be the new Bearpaw Diamond solo, seems similar to the style shelters you are comparing. Available in cuben for like 8 oz or something with full coverage but no netting.

Robert Kelly
(QiWiz) - MLife

Locale: UL gear @
Hexamid vs Gatewood, can't comment on the Cricket on 04/16/2012 07:00:20 MDT Print View

I used the Gatewood Cape for years as my primary shelter. Really liked it and have nothing but affection for it. I switched to the Hexamid with beak about six months ago to get superior non-stretchiness in rain (silnylon stretches, cuben does not) and wind resistance. No regrets on decision, but the Hexamid is way pricier. I use Joe's poncho groundsheet option for raingear in the same way I used the Gatewood (if expected condition are not really windy and I'm not bushwacking). This also gives me raingear I can wear in camp AFTER my shelter is set up.

Scott Simcox
(Simco) - F - M

Locale: Nashville
Re: Re: Gatewood v. Hexamid v. Cricket on 04/16/2012 17:40:03 MDT Print View

John, fantastic post and spreadsheet.