|
Ethanol for industrial uses (such as goes into denatured alcohol) is actually made by acid-catalyzed hydration of ethylene (a petrochemical), rather than fermentation of biomass.
Because of the lower energy content of ethanol, one might find that using ethanol as a fuel actually consumes _more_ non-renewable resources than white gas.
This would be an interesting analysis, my guess is that they're similar. This only takes into account production. For impacts like the consequences of accidental spills in the backcountry, ethanol wins hands down.
Of course, fermented ethanol is in common and increasing use as a fuel for motor vehicles, especially in other countries, but the dentatured stuff we can buy in the store is petroleum derived.
One could always use everclear / golden grain (in states where it's legal) and be assured of getting alcohol from a more renewable source.
Note that this may change in the near future:
"At petroleum prices like those that prevailed through much of the 1990s, ethylene hydration was a decidedly more economical process than fermentation for producing purified ethanol. Recent increases in petroleum prices, coupled with perennial uncertainty in agricultural prices, make forecasting the relative production costs of fermented versus petrochemical ethanol difficult at the present time."
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol
Edited by phageghost on 04/28/2006 13:50:44 MDT.
|