Forum Index » Philosophy & Technique » UL with a gun?


Display Avatars Sort By:
Luke Schmidt
(Cameron) - MLife

Locale: The WOODS
Re. Nick on 12/03/2009 13:18:28 MST Print View

I think you're right Nick I've said my peice and I'll probably leave this particular D.B. although last time I did learn some new stuff, we'll see how it plays out.

Edited by Cameron on 12/03/2009 13:19:06 MST.

Josh Kuntz
(Josh_Kuntz) - M

Locale: Montana/Utah/Arizona
Keep Up The Good Work on 12/03/2009 13:19:24 MST Print View

Ryan and the BPL team -

Just wanted to say thank you for all your good work and for continually introducing such a wide range of backpacking related topics. As this one has proven, some topics are sure to get members fired up, but that's just life.

Unfortunately some people do not have it in them to "agree to disagree" in a polite manner. For those members who are so upset with this topic...LEAVE. If you are so upset with BPL for one review, then go start your own website and write about exactly what you want.

As far as I'm concerned, BPL does a great job of bringing us interesting and helpful topics and positively connecting with the vast majority of it's members.

Keep it up BPL.

Josh

Davey Jones
(FamilyGuy) - F

Locale: Where there is snow
UL with a gun on 12/03/2009 13:25:49 MST Print View

"You are sriously misguided if you propose that teaching kids gun safety doesn't make them respect guns more. Almost any of us who grew up around guns and were taught about them will tell you that. A few demonstations with watermellons might provoke a desire to shoot watermellons in a youngster, but they are generally bright enough to get the message that the gun is a dangerous thing, too."

Here is a revelation Dean. I never grew up around guns. Perhaps most Americans did but the rest of the Western Democratic nations didn't. So no, I am not misguided. I don't like guns. Period.

"But to back Sarah up, I'm also tired enough of this debate- and recognize the futility of trying to change your mind- to look up studies for you. Don't be lazy. Read some research from the other side. I try to. Buth sides manipulate data in VERY underhanded ways. (But I'll admit that the left is probably more notorious for it.)"

Not lazy - I have done research on the 'other side.' Now that US state parks permit guns I will have to make a mental note to pack some heat on my next visit. Left, Right, really makes no difference to me but as a normal course of discussion this gradually leaks into a political discussion.

And on that note - I am outta here.

John Brochu
(JohnnyBgood4) - F

Locale: New Hampshire
Re: UL with a gun on 12/03/2009 13:35:42 MST Print View

All right, all this posts needs now to be complete is Dave T to swing by and complain about how off track it is while simultaneously tossing several Molotov cocktails into the works...! :-)

Brad Groves
(4quietwoods) - MLife

Locale: Michigan
re: hunting on 12/03/2009 13:49:27 MST Print View

Okay, sorry, but I couldn't keep this entirely focused on the gun given some of the comments that have been made.

If you eat meat and oppose hunting, then I think your stance is quite hypocritical. If you eat meat, someone had to slaughter and butcher an animal. They cut up the parcels of flesh into tidy bundles so that you don’t experience much discomfort in associating the meat with a living creature. How easy is it for people to buy a foam platter of 20 chicken wings? How many of you think about the fact that your 20 wings required the death and butchery of 10 chickens? Furthermore, if you’re buying meat from the local market it was most likely factory farmed, in what many would argue are less than humane conditions. Crammed in cages, surrounded by fecal matter and noise, unable to move, pumped full of food and drugs. Eating this meat is good, but hunting is bad?!

I was a vegetarian for many years because of the huge disconnect between meat products and consumer. Then I discovered the joy and, yes, the more spiritual connection with food as a hunter. There was no more disconnect with the food. I became much more conscious about my consumption of meat, and what that food consumption meant. When I take the life of an animal, I feel it. I thank it for its life in what I guess you could call a mini-prayer. (Yes, really, and sincerely.) I am intimately connected to the taking of life and the process of procuring the meat of the animal. Personally, it makes me think much more seriously about my consumption of meat, what it means. Other benefits? Wild game is as free-range as you can get. It’s also as organic as you’ll find. It doesn’t require nation-side shipping. I don’t use trays or plastics of any kind. So let’s see, sustainably harvested, free-range, organic, local meat with minimal to no packaging. Sounds like a very expensive cut of meat from Whole Foods or your local co-op. And yup, it sounds like a “liberal” thing. Don’t think you could possibly eat meat and find a more “liberal” way to approach it.

If you're not comfortable with the thought of someone killing and butchering an animal, perhaps you should be a vegetarian. Personally, I welcome this little .22 into the world and applaud its creation.

John Frederick Anderson
(fredfoto) - F

Locale: Spain
guns and forums = madness on 12/03/2009 13:55:25 MST Print View

Talking about guns on forums is madness.

Madness:

Doing the same thing over and over again,
Expecting a different result

I'll kill to eat if I have to (and have done), love trout fishing, but don't need to bring a gun into the backcountry when I can just as well hike in food and let the critters that are trying to survive in our diminishing wilderness live in peace. As humans, we've done enough to them already.

Shoot away if you want, I'm the one in the RED shirt.

cheers,
fred

James Patsalides
(james@patsalides.com) - MLife

Locale: New England
UL with a gun: +1 on the privilege argument! on 12/03/2009 14:24:20 MST Print View

Wow, this is such a fascinating debate for me...

I'm a Brit living in the US, and unlike most Brits, I was brought up with firearms from an early age. I got my first 410 when I was 9, graduated in high school to target shooting with .22 target rifles, owned a beautiful side-by-side 12-bore by the time I was 15, and ultimately became a competitive target shooter in the Army Cadets and Officer Training Corps using .303 and 7.62mm snipers' rifles. I've fired everything from handguns, assault rifles, sub-, general purpose and heavy machine guns, rocket launchers, ... I even got to shoot the main gun on Chieftain tank once. ;-)

Despite all of my hands on experience, I've come to believe that the *right* to bear arms in the US makes my adopted country a much more dangerous place than my nation of birth.

Until you've had a teenager pull a handgun on you in your own back yard, you just don't know what you're dealing with here... all I did was ask him to turn his music down a bit so I could hear my TV. Of course, I backed down right away, didn't make any sudden movements, diffused the situation etc - let me tell you, I've never been so terrified for my life and my family's life OR thankful for the local cops than that afternoon.

So... it really isn't the use of guns by trained responsible people who have a purpose for using their weapons (farming, hunting, law enforcement, military etc) that is the issue. It is the fact that ANYONE can own a gun and everyone is supposed to think that gun ownership is just a NORMAL part of life. I suspect that most of the folks posting here fall into my "trained responsible" category, and *should* consider themselves unusual and privaleged to own guns...

Just my $0.02. +1 on gun owning being a privalege that you get to EARN as an individual.

Luke Schmidt
(Cameron) - MLife

Locale: The WOODS
Interesting Perspective James on 12/03/2009 15:05:50 MST Print View

Very intersting perspective James. Glad you made it out of that situation okay. I would hope that young man who pulled a gun on you went to jail.
Your military story brings up an interesting point. In America and Europe we have tens of millions of military personal and military veterans, all of whom have been trained to kill. But these guys don't all become nutjobs, most of them are perfectly normal people. Whatever a persons views on gun laws the fact is exposure to guns won't necessarily make you violent.

The Idemonster
(idester) - MLife

Locale: MidAtlantic
Re: Interesting Perspective James on 12/03/2009 15:21:23 MST Print View

"tens of millions of military personal and military veterans, all of whom have been trained to kill."

This is a bit of an overstatement. Perhaps more than a bit. Nowhere near tens of millions. And while combat arms troops are perhaps 'trained to kill' the vast majority of military personnel are in a support role. They are trained to shoot. They are given basic combat skills training. But I don't know that I'd say they're 'trained to kill.' Depends, I guess, on your interpretation of that phrase.

David Olsen
(oware) - F

Locale: Columbia Highlands
Re: UL with a gun: +1 on the privilege argument! on 12/03/2009 15:27:09 MST Print View

"Until you've had a teenager pull a handgun on you in your own back yard, you just don't know what you're dealing with here..."

Do you suppose his Dad took him to the range when he was younger?

Josh Leavitt
(Joshleavitt) - F

Locale: Ruta Locura
Range on 12/03/2009 15:35:02 MST Print View

"Do you suppose his Dad took him to the range when he was younger?"

:-)

Luke Schmidt
(Cameron) - MLife

Locale: The WOODS
Training on 12/03/2009 16:18:35 MST Print View

Trained to kill refered to using guns as weapons not target shooting, I know only a few soldiers really focus on true combat shooting. The main point was if you include all the people who are alive and have served in the military in the US/Europe thats a lot of guys getting very familiar with guns as weapons(I was guessing millions because we have plenty of guys who served 40 ago still with us). The point was they didn't all go nuts after that.

Edited by Cameron on 12/03/2009 16:23:47 MST.

Tom Kirchner
(ouzel) - MLife

Locale: Pacific Northwest/Sierra
Re: Re: Re. Re. Re. Re. Guns on 12/03/2009 17:23:27 MST Print View

"There is no resolution to the debate, so why would we undertake a task that we know we cannot resolve or win?"

A toxic brew of sheer human orneriness and religious fervor.

Lynn Tramper
(retropump) - F

Locale: The Antipodes of La Coruna
Re: re: hunting on 12/03/2009 17:24:09 MST Print View

"If you (or someone else) don't eat what you kill you're a butcher, not a "sportsman." Probable exception for pest critters- if we knock their ecosystem so out of whack that a species overpopulates then we have a duty to correct it as best we can."

Amen, but as far as I can tell ALL of the hunting that goes on in NZ just happens to kill pest critters. So what does that make hunters/rifle ownership here?

"If you eat meat and oppose hunting, then I think your stance is quite hypocritical. If you eat meat, someone had to slaughter and butcher an animal."

Also agree with this. I was a vegan for over 20 years due to many factors, including my disgust at 'modern' farming and slaughtering methods. I would much sooner eat something wild I had killed myself than most of the stuff that ends up at the grocery store.

The gun debate, well it is obviously futile to debate the topic. I grew up with guns...used to get paid $1 for every bird I killed in my grandfather's orchard, using a BB gun. My parents had a handgun in the house. That was in the USA. I am soooo relieved now to live in a country where handguns are legally restricted to military/police, and rifles must be locked up at all times, with ammo separate, except when hunting or range shooting. Like Dean said, leaving a gun lying around loaded for a child to stumble across should be a very serious crime IMHO. Of course, that doesn't stop someone from stabbing me with a knife, of using their rifle illegally to shoot at me, or using a bow + arrow, etc...But the death-by-shooting stats in the US clearly show that letting anyone own and carry a loaded gun leads to significantly more deaths by gunshot. That is the trade of allowing the "right" to bear arms (which is clearly a privilege as it can be revoked for many reasons).

What does this have to do with the Pak-Rifle? Well I think it would be a great tool for pest control of small game in this country (possum down anyone??). I think the review was clear that it was in no way a political statement, merely a review of a UL piece of hunting gear, which to me is entirely fitting with this site's mission. To come down hard on the review while letting the Tenkara review go without controversy seems hypocrisy to me. We also talk all the time about UL knives and other potentially deadly tools. Personally I would like to know how light is the lightest Taser if I were in bear country...!

Edited by retropump on 12/03/2009 17:25:41 MST.

David Olsen
(oware) - F

Locale: Columbia Highlands
Deer Hunting with Jesus on 12/03/2009 17:29:26 MST Print View

For those of you with redneck roots and a liberal adulthood,
who don't mind reading works written in a ranting blogger
style, you might enjoy 'Deer Hunting with Jesus'.

http://www.amazon.com/Deer-Hunting-Jesus-Dispatches-Americas/dp/0307339378/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259886448&sr=8-1

It has an excellent chapter on Guns and why people value
them so much in parts of US society.

Edited by oware on 12/03/2009 17:29:58 MST.

Davey Jones
(FamilyGuy) - F

Locale: Where there is snow
UL with a gun on 12/03/2009 17:32:54 MST Print View

But I DO get it afterall. You all carry guns to protect yourself from the nutjobs who carry guns who are protecting themselves from worse nutjobs who carry guns to protect themselves from pesky critters, bears that don't respond to tazers, global warming pundits, and those that didn't hang out with Dad at the shooting range when they were younger and like their music really loud.

Tom Kirchner
(ouzel) - MLife

Locale: Pacific Northwest/Sierra
Re: Re: UL with a sad plant on 12/03/2009 17:34:09 MST Print View

"I would just like to enter this volatile thread for a moment to say that I believe plants are sentient beings."

Remember that the next time you're getting ready to shoot one. ;}

The Idemonster
(idester) - MLife

Locale: MidAtlantic
Re: Deer Hunting with Jesus on 12/03/2009 17:59:20 MST Print View

"For those of you with redneck roots and a liberal adulthood,
who don't mind reading works written in a ranting blogger
style, you might enjoy 'Deer Hunting with Jesus'."

I might not fit the profile, but I'll agree that this is a great book! Joe Bageant is an interesting guy. I came across him on NPR. Interesting website he has too.

And senator, I will neither confirm nor deny that I was ever a member of the democratic/republican/libertarian/communist party.

The Idemonster
(idester) - MLife

Locale: MidAtlantic
Re: Re: Re: UL with a sad plant on 12/03/2009 18:00:16 MST Print View

""I would just like to enter this volatile thread for a moment to say that I believe plants are sentient beings."

Remember that the next time you're getting ready to shoot one. ;}"

Well thanks a lot Tom! Now I've got to clean this snot from all over my computer screen! Good thing I wasn't drinking milk!

David Olsen
(oware) - F

Locale: Columbia Highlands
plant activist on 12/03/2009 18:08:52 MST Print View

Now some would use tractors, shovels or other machinery, but
I prefer to "harvest" plants bare handed, just me and the
food, mano-a-mano.

If the thought of a carrot screaming as you wrench it from
the ground bothers you, then you should probably be a
fruitarian, eating only those parts of a plant given in free
will.

And think of the poor corn and wheat forced to grow in
rows, never knowing what it was like to have their unborn
be carried far and wide in the bowels of some bird.

Cranberries, Cranberries, throw off your chains!