|
Hi Kenneth,
First, I've had a Squall Classic for a long time with many trips. I've had the Refuge for just one trip now and my observations are based only on this. A full review of the Refuge will be coming later- but my review of the Squall Classic can be found on this site. With this in mind, here is my quick analysis:
Benefits of the Squall Classic- bathtub floor, slightly lighter (vs. a silnylon Refuge), Spinnaker doesn't stetch as much when wet, lower profile, catenary ridge makes for an easy taut pitch, requires only 4 stakes (2 more optional), interior pockets
Benefits of the Refuge- way more interior space to sit up, will fit a very tall hiker (much like the Squall Classic), increased ventilation due to large triangular vents near the top, can pitch to the ground which decreases rain splash, integrated floor raises up on sides (partly negating the need to have a bathtub floor), side entry door (a preference thing), requires 6 stakes (2 more for side pull-outs, no need for a rear hoop pole
For me, it comes down to interior space. In the Squal Classic, one person can sit up. In the Refuge, I think 4 adults could sit up and play cards. You may lose some wind stability but you gain storm protection (rain splash, blowing rain or snow). I love my Squall Classic but right now, I'm thinking that the Refuge will become my first choice for two person, three season backpacking. But field testing has only begun! My full review will lkely include some new revelations. It will also include field testing of the Cuben Refuge X as well.
My review's timeline is not set yet- likely mid summer. Until then, best of luck with your decision!
Doug
|