*You* stated that the motive for scientists to lie was grant money. Since grant money doesn't actually go to the scientist who win the grants (ie. it doesn't end up in their pockets), how is winning grants a motive for lying?
Your comments above indicate that you know nothing about how grants work. If you did, you would know that winning grants would be no motivation for lying.
If you weren't implying that scientist get rich from grant money, how exactly do you relate "grants, money" to the accusations of scientists lying? You were the one who said that money was the motivation...
So, do you accept that there is no financial motivation for scientists to lie about climate change, or not? If you don't accept that, then you have proved that you have no understanding about how "grants, money" works.
Sorry, I've run out of ways to try and say this.