Subscribe Contribute Advertise Facebook Twitter Instagram Forums Newsletter

M Lightweight Dry Sacks: Comparison Testing Results

by Carol Crooker

An online subscription (Annual or Lifetime) is required to view this article.

Not yet a Premium Member? Subscribe now.

Already a Premium Member? Please login using the form to the right.

Not ready to become a member, but need the article? Buy access to just this article.

Article Summary:

There are occasions when a dry sack might appeal to a lightweight backpacker, for example when canyoneering, or in extreme wet weather as found in Patagonia, New Zealand and the US Pacific Northwest to name a few locales. But under what conditions can you expect a lightweight dry sack to keep your gear dry? How about if you fall when crossing a river, don't have room in your bivy and leave clothing in a dry sack out in the rain all night, or, as happened to one of our staff in Patagonia, unpack in camp in the evening to find that your pack is holding a couple of inches of water in the bottom - where your sleeping bag is?

Descriptions on manufacturer web sites aren't of much help, only emphasizing that the dry sacks are waterproof. A typical description (from Outdoor Research) is, "This dry sack offers lightweight, compressible protection. The fabric has a waterproof coating and the seams are taped to keep moisture out. A roll-top closure keeps your gear dry and secure." There is no mention of the limit of conditions the bag is expected to keep gear "dry and secure." Performance is caveated by all the manufacturers of lightweight dry sacks I tested (except Outdoor Research) somewhere, at a minimum saying that the bags won't withstand extended submersion, and often that valuable items should be double bagged. Only Granite Gear mentions any caveat on their website, other companies mention the limitations on the packaging or in the instructions inside the package.

I put the lightest dry sacks available from Outdoor Research, Sea to Summit, Granite Gear, Cascade Designs (SealLine), and Pacific Outdoor Equipment through five tests. My objective was to understand the performance limitations of these dry sacks. The test methods and results follow.

ARTICLE OUTLINE

# WORDS: 4100
# PHOTOS: 10
# TABLES: 5

Buy Access to This Article

If you do not want to subscribe and get access to all BPL articles, you may instead opt to buy this single article: "Lightweight Dry Sacks: Comparison Testing Results"